Next you're going to tell us that Barack Obama is a moderate

This guy makes some good points, but I think his overall argument is flawed. It all hinges on his definition of the word 'liberal', which he seems to equate with 'radical'. It may be a dictionary definition, but it's not the one you will find in a poli. sci. class. I do agree that people overreact to things like the Cap. America Tea Party issue. It's a fucking comic book. Move on.

I think you misunderstand his points. he's not saying liberals aren't liberal, but that most are not truly radicals in the sense that some want to think. he's saying that the majority of liberals and conservatives really want the same thing. A point you and I have made in conversation before.

in relation to the Tea Party, he's not saying they aren't conservative, but that they are radical conservatives. it's all in relation to his point about whether or not any of the various groups in question truly want to change the status quo.

as most so called "liberals and/or conservatives" want to keep the basic status quo, again they essentially want the same thing. as relates to superhero books, they're generally about keeping the status quo as well.

Bull. Shit.

"No superhero comic from Marvel or DC is liberal in the truest sense of the word, challenging the status quo."

Interesting wordplay. Basically every single page of every book could be communist manifesto garbage, but because that's the status quo, it's not really liberal.